Post by macmex on Aug 18, 2019 15:15:31 GMT -6
Over the years I have had a fascination with Appalachian beans, and this, in spite of the fact that neither I nor my wife hail from the area. However, early in our marriage, my wife's grand aunt and uncle gave us seed to Tennessee Cutshort, which originated in the Appalachians. The first time I grew Tennessee Cutshort I was impressed with it's productivity and vitality as a variety. The pods made wonderful snaps and the seed was large and more rounded than other beans I had been accustomed to. Aunt Clara's aunt (Olive Stroup), who gave them their start of seed, told them that this bean was grown "all over the South." So, as the years went by, and I grew Tennessee Cutshort, I developed some curiosity about that bean and other similar varieties which might exist, and have arisen in the same general area (somewhere in Tennessee).
Tennessee Cutshort Seed
Shortly after we moved to Oklahoma (2005) I had correspondence with Gene Hosey, who, though he lived in Washington D.C., had roots in Kentucky. Gene asked me if his mother's heirloom bean might not be the same as Tennessee Cutshort, as it had rounded, brown colored seed. I thought it was unlikely, considering all the beans "out there," but Gene sent me a sample of seed in 2007, and upon growing it out, I was amazed how similar it was to Tennessee Cutshort. I couldn't tell the two apart! Gene commented that his family got their start from Eddie Childers of Merrimac, KY (Taylor County). When I looked it up, I saw that Merrimac was quite close to the Tennessee border. I thought, "I bet that's close to wherever Olive Stroup's relatives lived!"
This got me started on the idea of growing some more beans, with similar descriptions, which hailed from the Appalachians. In 2007 I not only grew Childers Cutshort but also obtained seed of Ruth Bible, a Kentucky heirloom which I had read about, and which appeared to be somewhat similar to Tennessee Cutshort. The earliest reference to Ruth Bible I had seen was in the 1984 edition of the Seed Savers Exchange fall yearbook. It was being offered by three people, all in Virginia.
Here are the listings, modified only enough to make them more intelligible to someone unfamiliar with the Yearbook's format.
VA MC J (Jeff McCormick in North Garden, VA) 52-70 days, Bouy's family heirloom, Kentucky, 1832, tender 3.5" pods, slight strings, brownish - tan seeds, samples to two mid-Atlantic SSE members who will reoffer, O.S. VA MI B (Benny Michitti in Carrollton, VA)
VA MI B (Benny Michitti in Carrollton, VA) 65 days, brown seed, tender hull with strings, Kentucky heirloom strain over 150 years old, seed from West Virginia.
VA PU R(Ruth Putnum in Syriam VA) 100 days, heirloom bean traced back to Kentucky to at least 1832, pods 3.5", best picked when small, high climbers, 84 VA MC J
I grew this bean in 2007, and according to my notes, I never grew it again, until this year. However, the jar of seeds in my freezer, from which I took my stock this spring, has a label which reads "Ruth Bible 2010." I guess I must have grown it in 2010 and neglected to take notes.
Here are my notes on Ruth Bible, grown near Tahlequah, OK (drought year).
Planted Ruth Bible 5/5/2007 first planting
Started flowering a tad later than Childers and Tennessee Cutshort
6/19/2007 Planted a second planting of Ruth Bible (one pole)
7/5/2007 first picking of Ruth Bible
7/8/2007 Tried eating pods. Ruth Bible pods seem to toughen up a bit earlier than do Childers and Tennessee Cutshort. Pods are longer, more slender and more round. Ruth Bible continued flowering and setting pods longer than either Childers or Tennessee Cutshort, which began to dry down by the middle of July.
7/23/2007 First dry seed, 79 days
I stashed the harvested seed on my seed shelf and nearly forgot it. Life was really busy and... I'm not a very organized person. My impression of Ruth Bible was quite good. It was vigorous and not only produced well, it made a lot of seed. But I got over extended and failed to grow it out, at least until 2010, and definitely not again until this year.
I continue to have an interest in these kinds of beans, especially from that part of the world.
Why? Well, for one thing, they are uncommon and not enjoying a lot of favor in the general gardening community. Most folk run with more common varieties, such as Blue Lake Pole, Fortex or Kentucky Wonder (which really doesn't do that well in our neck of the woods) I mention this in a blog I wrote: When Beans Don't Produce.
Another reason I love these beans is that they are so extremely productive and practical. Their snaps are nice, large and fat, making it easy to "pick a mess" for supper. Even though they have strings, they are faster to prepare than many varieties, due to their larger size. They are super tender, being of the tender hull kind. And... they all have a HISTORY!
Ruth Bible was grown and preserved by the Bouys family, somewhere in Kentucky. They had this seed since at least 1832, long before the Civil War. Obviously, they thought it was a good bean. I heard and read of the variety for 23 years before trying it.
This spring I ran across the jar of seed and thought, "I really need to grow out this bean." I need to get to know it better." So, I planted it in a small garden I have at work.
I planted a patch of Ruth Bible on June 10, in its own little garden. The picture is from June 17. I had trouble with wrens or some other small bird nipping of the seedlings. So I did have to replant some poles.
This picture was taken August 16, 2009. Ruth Bible has grown very vigorously. In fact, this time around, I observed that Ruth Bible "throws out its arms," looking for more support. This tendency to extend itself horizontally is unique. I've only observed this characteristic with Tarahumara Pink Green Bean. It makes Ruth Bible a super vigorous bean, which I suspect would do exceedingly well, grown on the edge of a cornfield.
Ruth Bible is extremely productive, which is a very good thing! It truly meets one of my favorite criteria for a garden variety. I like to ask, "If this was the only variety of this vegetable, could I be happy growing it? With Ruth Bible, I can definitely say "yes."
Here's another picture of Ruth Bible, bearing pods. Notice that these pods get knobby. That is a characteristic of many Appalachian beans. Folk there are suspicious of beans that don't look like that, as they enjoy having the seed in their snaps. Ruth Bible fits this slot very nicely, though, a person could pick it earlier, if they wanted to avoid having seed.
This is what Ruth Bible Seed looks like. Notice that there is more variation in shape than in Tennessee Cutshort seed. Yet, it is similar. This is a bean which could be raised as a dry bean, though I probably wouldn't do it. It would be a bit of work to shell. Still, it has the potential to be an all purpose bean, with its strong suite as a snap.
I've done some searching on the internet, and it's obvious that Ruth Bible is not currently popular among gardeners. I will continue to grow it out and share seed. Hopefully, this fall, I can send seed to Sandhill Preservation Center. As the Drowns are so very good at preserving and offering these old varieties. They don't care if they're not popular, they keep them going!
Tennessee Cutshort Seed
Shortly after we moved to Oklahoma (2005) I had correspondence with Gene Hosey, who, though he lived in Washington D.C., had roots in Kentucky. Gene asked me if his mother's heirloom bean might not be the same as Tennessee Cutshort, as it had rounded, brown colored seed. I thought it was unlikely, considering all the beans "out there," but Gene sent me a sample of seed in 2007, and upon growing it out, I was amazed how similar it was to Tennessee Cutshort. I couldn't tell the two apart! Gene commented that his family got their start from Eddie Childers of Merrimac, KY (Taylor County). When I looked it up, I saw that Merrimac was quite close to the Tennessee border. I thought, "I bet that's close to wherever Olive Stroup's relatives lived!"
This got me started on the idea of growing some more beans, with similar descriptions, which hailed from the Appalachians. In 2007 I not only grew Childers Cutshort but also obtained seed of Ruth Bible, a Kentucky heirloom which I had read about, and which appeared to be somewhat similar to Tennessee Cutshort. The earliest reference to Ruth Bible I had seen was in the 1984 edition of the Seed Savers Exchange fall yearbook. It was being offered by three people, all in Virginia.
Here are the listings, modified only enough to make them more intelligible to someone unfamiliar with the Yearbook's format.
VA MC J (Jeff McCormick in North Garden, VA) 52-70 days, Bouy's family heirloom, Kentucky, 1832, tender 3.5" pods, slight strings, brownish - tan seeds, samples to two mid-Atlantic SSE members who will reoffer, O.S. VA MI B (Benny Michitti in Carrollton, VA)
VA MI B (Benny Michitti in Carrollton, VA) 65 days, brown seed, tender hull with strings, Kentucky heirloom strain over 150 years old, seed from West Virginia.
VA PU R(Ruth Putnum in Syriam VA) 100 days, heirloom bean traced back to Kentucky to at least 1832, pods 3.5", best picked when small, high climbers, 84 VA MC J
I grew this bean in 2007, and according to my notes, I never grew it again, until this year. However, the jar of seeds in my freezer, from which I took my stock this spring, has a label which reads "Ruth Bible 2010." I guess I must have grown it in 2010 and neglected to take notes.
Here are my notes on Ruth Bible, grown near Tahlequah, OK (drought year).
Planted Ruth Bible 5/5/2007 first planting
Started flowering a tad later than Childers and Tennessee Cutshort
6/19/2007 Planted a second planting of Ruth Bible (one pole)
7/5/2007 first picking of Ruth Bible
7/8/2007 Tried eating pods. Ruth Bible pods seem to toughen up a bit earlier than do Childers and Tennessee Cutshort. Pods are longer, more slender and more round. Ruth Bible continued flowering and setting pods longer than either Childers or Tennessee Cutshort, which began to dry down by the middle of July.
7/23/2007 First dry seed, 79 days
I stashed the harvested seed on my seed shelf and nearly forgot it. Life was really busy and... I'm not a very organized person. My impression of Ruth Bible was quite good. It was vigorous and not only produced well, it made a lot of seed. But I got over extended and failed to grow it out, at least until 2010, and definitely not again until this year.
I continue to have an interest in these kinds of beans, especially from that part of the world.
Why? Well, for one thing, they are uncommon and not enjoying a lot of favor in the general gardening community. Most folk run with more common varieties, such as Blue Lake Pole, Fortex or Kentucky Wonder (which really doesn't do that well in our neck of the woods) I mention this in a blog I wrote: When Beans Don't Produce.
Another reason I love these beans is that they are so extremely productive and practical. Their snaps are nice, large and fat, making it easy to "pick a mess" for supper. Even though they have strings, they are faster to prepare than many varieties, due to their larger size. They are super tender, being of the tender hull kind. And... they all have a HISTORY!
Ruth Bible was grown and preserved by the Bouys family, somewhere in Kentucky. They had this seed since at least 1832, long before the Civil War. Obviously, they thought it was a good bean. I heard and read of the variety for 23 years before trying it.
This spring I ran across the jar of seed and thought, "I really need to grow out this bean." I need to get to know it better." So, I planted it in a small garden I have at work.
I planted a patch of Ruth Bible on June 10, in its own little garden. The picture is from June 17. I had trouble with wrens or some other small bird nipping of the seedlings. So I did have to replant some poles.
This picture was taken August 16, 2009. Ruth Bible has grown very vigorously. In fact, this time around, I observed that Ruth Bible "throws out its arms," looking for more support. This tendency to extend itself horizontally is unique. I've only observed this characteristic with Tarahumara Pink Green Bean. It makes Ruth Bible a super vigorous bean, which I suspect would do exceedingly well, grown on the edge of a cornfield.
Ruth Bible is extremely productive, which is a very good thing! It truly meets one of my favorite criteria for a garden variety. I like to ask, "If this was the only variety of this vegetable, could I be happy growing it? With Ruth Bible, I can definitely say "yes."
Here's another picture of Ruth Bible, bearing pods. Notice that these pods get knobby. That is a characteristic of many Appalachian beans. Folk there are suspicious of beans that don't look like that, as they enjoy having the seed in their snaps. Ruth Bible fits this slot very nicely, though, a person could pick it earlier, if they wanted to avoid having seed.
This is what Ruth Bible Seed looks like. Notice that there is more variation in shape than in Tennessee Cutshort seed. Yet, it is similar. This is a bean which could be raised as a dry bean, though I probably wouldn't do it. It would be a bit of work to shell. Still, it has the potential to be an all purpose bean, with its strong suite as a snap.
I've done some searching on the internet, and it's obvious that Ruth Bible is not currently popular among gardeners. I will continue to grow it out and share seed. Hopefully, this fall, I can send seed to Sandhill Preservation Center. As the Drowns are so very good at preserving and offering these old varieties. They don't care if they're not popular, they keep them going!